The personal disquiet of

Mark Boulton

February 9th, 2007

A naming competition

Anyone who has ever been in a band will know how dif­fi­cult nam­ing the band can be. It is no dif­fer­ent for a new business. 

I find nam­ing incred­ibly dif­fi­cult. It really isn’t one of my strong points. 

Unfor­tu­nately though, next Thursday, I have to register myself as a new com­pany name and I’m com­pletely devoid of inspir­a­tion. So, I thought I’d hold a com­pet­i­tion to find me a good name. Lazy? yes, I sup­pose. Thing is, I’m totally stacked with fin­ish­ing off the book and a moun­tain of cli­ent work. Sit­ting here with a blank piece of paper (after think­ing of names) for about an hour now has not been a pro­duct­ive use of my time.

For the past six months, I’ve been trad­ing as Mark Boulton Design. Well, soon, there are going to be more of us and I’m a little nervous about my name being so asso­ci­ated with the busi­ness name. It could be a good thing, but it could also be a very bad thing. 

What’s in it for us Mark?

An iPod Shuffle for the win­ner. Can’t say fairer than that. 

Some bor­ing rules and criteria

I’m a graphic designer and run a UI and graphic design busi­ness. If you’ve been read­ing my blog, you will know what kind of designer I am and what I’m all about. So, a name like ‘Purple Dog’ may not be appro­pri­ate. I’m after some­thing simple and mem­or­able that might, or might not, be related to the ser­vice I offer.

Pop the names in the comments

Post your sug­ges­tions here (along with url sug­ges­tions if you fancy). 

The com­pet­i­tion will close on the 15th Feb­ru­ary (9am UK time) and a win­ner will be announced shortly after that. 

In the mean­time, I’ll be going back to my blank sheet of paper

100 Responses to “A naming competition”

  1. boyd wiebe said on: February 9th, 2007 at 9:41 am

    boundingbox.com

  2. Paul D. said on: February 9th, 2007 at 9:45 am

    [Play­ing off your name:] 

    Bolt Action Creative 

    [Min­imal, address-related:] 

    Stu­dio 11

    [Play­ing off your city name:] 

    Valour Design

  3. Joshua Brewer said on: February 9th, 2007 at 9:59 am

    Simple Steps or Simple Steps Design (simplestepsdesign.com is avail­able, btw) and yeah, I know Sim­ple­Bits and all…but it is kinda your brand.

  4. Saad Siddiqui said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:00 am

    flushstudio.com

    (typo­graphy term i geuss)

  5. Nick said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:07 am

    Boulton Like Micheal Creative

  6. Mark Boulton said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:11 am

    Nick: Nice, although I’m not sure my Account­ant would agree.

  7. Chris Gibbons said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:22 am

    Play­ing of what someone else men­tioned about bolt action — gun — and your love of typo­graphy, hows about point12. 

    Play on words really… 

    Also the .co.uk is available :)

  8. David, biologeek said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:23 am

    Design think­ing

    Simplest Design 

    Simply Pixels 

    Mark Design

  9. Brian Artka said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:37 am

    Play on your name.. 

    No Boul(or Bull) Cre­at­ive (but im not sure how to pro­nounce your name, is it “Bull”?) 

    first thing that came to my mind… I’ll have more.

  10. Josh B. said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:47 am

    Boult-On Design

    reMark Design

  11. Brian Artka said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:53 am

    emB Design (or Creative)

    play on the “em” using your initials

  12. Rex said on: February 9th, 2007 at 10:55 am

    The Boult

  13. Gilles Defever said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:01 am

    MB ;-)

    boulted design

    boult­ing design

  14. boyd wiebe said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:06 am

    seems like boundingbox.co.uk is avail­abe. I like the emB Design that Brian sug­ges­ted too.

  15. Nick said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:18 am

    Sorry couldn’t res­ist :-) No more snappy names, but why not find a name that reflects your philo­sophy or sense of design?

  16. Gilles Defever said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:18 am

    design­markup

    both .com and .co.uk are still available…

  17. Matt Henderson said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:23 am

    Kram Notloub Design

  18. Moises Kirsch said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:51 am

    Maybe some­thing related to your book… 

    5 Steps Cre­at­ive

    5ss Design

    5ss Cre­at­ive

    Simple Steps Cre­at­ive

    Simple Steps Design

    5SS Studio

  19. Josh Read said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:52 am

    Mark,

    You already own fivesimplesteps.co.uk

    why not name your com­pany that? Instead of the web 2.0 pro­cess of 1,2,3 you could up those web 2.0 nerds and be like schick razors, go for five. Skip web 3.0 & 4.0, start a new trend web 5.0 the mark boulton way. My vote is name your com­pany five simple steps.

  20. boyd wiebe said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    col­our­Bus

  21. Dan said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    BType [Design] — btype.co.uk

  22. boyd wiebe said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:30 pm

    siteweaver

  23. Micheal said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:37 pm

    I recom­mend you keep Mark Boulton Design as your com­pany name. 

    The name recognition/brand you have built is price­less.  Why start all over build­ing a new brand? 

    If you are nervous about our name being asso­ci­ated with the busi­ness, maybe you should recon­sider your busi­ness plans. 

    If you can­not trust those you have hired to pro­duce high qual­ity work, let them go. 

    Micheal

  24. Luis Mendo said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:39 pm

    MARK ON

    MRKBLTN 

    SMPL 

    I hope you suceed, nice idea to put the con­test online :)

  25. Micheal said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:43 pm

    I meant to say in my post: 

    “If you are nervous about *your*…”.

  26. Michael said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:45 pm

    I read some­where that busi­nesses named after the founder fail sig­ni­fic­antly more often than busi­nesses that are not.  It could just be a coin­cid­ence but I’d wager that the types of folks that would name a busi­ness after them­selves usu­ally have an ego that makes doing busi­ness dif­fi­cult.  I’d recom­mend against a com­pany named after your­self in any way (ini­tials, pun, mash up, …) mostly because I think it is silly, but there is anec­dotal data to back it up (I just can’t seem to be able to find it right now). 

    Josh Read: cool name idea, dumb reas­on­ing.  Web 2.0 is a concept, not a thing so “web 5.0” doesn’t make any sense.

    Michael

  27. The Wife said on: February 9th, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    I’ve been try­ing to think of a name that sums up Mark’s design philo­sophy. It’s tricky though. One of the names I came up with — ‘Har­mony’, Mark said soun­ded more like a lingerie shop. 

    Then, I star­ted think­ing about the Golden Sec­tion and the Divine Pro­por­tion in nature as I think it sums up how Mark approaches design. The com­pany name needs to be some­thing that says ‘clean, simple and eleg­ant’ but I still haven’t found the right com­bin­a­tion of words… some of my sug­ges­tions are…

    Design philo­sophy

    White orchid design

    Em dash

    Per­fect leaf

    Leaf design

    Design har­mony

    Har­mony design

    Per­fect proportion

    Snow­flake

    Design union

    Design sym­metry

    Har­mony

    222.5 degrees

    Fibon­acci spiral

    1.6 or one point six

    Coun­ter­point

    Design res­on­ance

    Inter­val

    Divine proportion 

    Some are very lame…I’m not after an ipod by the way — I got one for my birthday.

  28. Dimitry said on: February 9th, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    Mind­vest

    Cre­ateNext

    Stu­dio Train 

    Good luck,

    Dimitry

  29. David said on: February 9th, 2007 at 1:14 pm

    boultems.com

  30. David Yeiser said on: February 9th, 2007 at 1:30 pm

    Here are some simple, slightly abstract names that I tried to relate to UI and Design.  (But maybe you shouldn’t listen to me, I came up with a name, bought a domain, star­ted design­ing it, and then changed it.) 

    Click Design

    Approach Design

    Organ­ized Design

  31. Chuck Burdick said on: February 9th, 2007 at 1:48 pm

    bostu­dio (for “boulton”, co.uk avail)

    cogibo (after “design think­ing”, avail)

    sec­tio (after latin for golden ratio, co.uk avail)

  32. Gerald Cameron said on: February 9th, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    Serif Design

    http://www.serifdesign.co.uk seems to be unused

  33. David said on: February 9th, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    Nice, Chuck.

    Dig the last two.

  34. Jay Larson said on: February 9th, 2007 at 2:03 pm

    High Marks Design

  35. boyd wiebe said on: February 9th, 2007 at 2:22 pm

    Boulter Com­mu­nic­a­tions

  36. tranquocbao said on: February 9th, 2007 at 2:40 pm

    i love the name Nasty Mon­key but not match to your

    require­ment. Maybe some­thing like

    Boulton Interactive

  37. Mark Otto said on: February 9th, 2007 at 3:22 pm

    Mark Boulton

    Clean, mul­tipur­pose, symob­lic. Reminds me of Leo Bur­nett. It’d serve to embody who and what you are, not just what you do (like Mark Boulton Design would).

  38. Mark Rall said on: February 9th, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Boulton UI

    Boutlon UI Design

    UI Designs

    UI Web Designs 

    All very lit­eral I know but hey “Snakes on planes”

  39. boyd wiebe said on: February 9th, 2007 at 3:44 pm

    Boulton Group,

    Boulton Asso­ci­ates,

    boulton bloc,

    Boulton Guild

  40. John said on: February 9th, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    Pro­duct­ive Use

  41. Graham Sanders said on: February 9th, 2007 at 4:09 pm

    John Hicks has hicksdesign(dotcodotuk), Peter Gill has petergill(dotcom), Jef­frey Zeld­man has zeldman(dotcom)so per­son­ally I think you should retain your brand and keep it markboulton(dotcodotuk) 

    How­ever, on sta­tion­ery etc you still could call the com­pany some­thing like 

    Mark Boulton design

    Mark Boulton and associates

    Mark Boulton cre­at­ive

    Mark Boulton design thinking 

    or how about:

    design-thinking(dotcodotuk) 

    markboultondesign(dotcodotuk) would be my other choice though. I see you quite rightly have bought it more than likely with the know­ledge that hav­ing a good name helps search endgine rank­ings anyway 

    I think that’s an iPod Shuffle to me then :)

  42. Wes Biffar said on: February 9th, 2007 at 6:09 pm

    MRK-BLTN Design

  43. Elle said on: February 9th, 2007 at 8:29 pm

    I agree with the com­ments that say keep it simple and keep it with your name.

    You already have your repu­ta­tion. And if you have so much trouble find­ing a name, it’s not intu­it­ive and it will not feel right. (maybe. maybe I’m wrong.)

    I think you should stay with Mark Boulton Design.

  44. Mike D. said on: February 9th, 2007 at 9:04 pm

    Mark The Maker, Inc. 

    markthemaker.com

  45. Gareth said on: February 9th, 2007 at 11:46 pm

    I think you should just drop your first name and use… 

    Boulton Designs. 

    That way the name change isn’t massive and it won’t con­fuse your exist­ing cli­ents. It removes the one man brand­ing but still remains you.

  46. simon r jones said on: February 10th, 2007 at 7:36 am

    some tips for when i went through this fun process.. 

    Brain­storm some words/concepts around that sum up what you do and where you want to be (ideally with your other busi­ness part­ners if they are keen on the name change) 

    Find words around these con­cepts, even if they are seem­ingly unre­lated. Simple, more abstract words tend to be more effect­ive than descript­ive words (i.e. Think Left, Clear Think­ing). Say the words aloud, if they flow well that’s a big help. 

    I.e “Happy Cog” (Zeldman’s com­pany): Cog = inter­act­ive, Happy just sounds nice together 

    Finally writea list of pos­sib­il­it­ies and check these against avail­able domain names / and at Com­pan­ies House. 

    If you get stuck on domains remem­ber a Ltd com­pany is entitled to register the .ltd.uk domain name as long as its the same as their registered com­pany name. 

    Don’t rush the pro­cess. Once you start a busi­ness you’ll be stuck with the name for a while. So make sure you’re happy with it. 

    good luck

  47. Richard Henry said on: February 10th, 2007 at 7:52 am

    1) The Kern­ing Room Floor 

    Okay, you love typo­graphy. The name is all about ‘The Cut­ting Room Floor’, where in the movie industry film is edited, you do the same with type. Per­haps also Lig­at­ure Room Floor.… so on, so on, think of any typo­graph­ical term, and pick the one that’s the strongest, sounds the coolest, and that means the most to you.

    2) Your name! “Mark Boulton” (I’m sure you’re famil­iar with it :) 

    So many great design com­pan­ies keep the name of the guy/girl head­ing them. Why not do the same? Has infin­ite class, you look like a real designer rather than a bunch of web mon­keys, which some names can portray. 

    3) Semantic Creative 

    Also, per­haps Semantic Design, depend­ing upon your pref­er­ence. People who don’t know what Semantic means will think ‘cool!’ and people who do will think ‘cool!’. You can’t lose. Also per­haps Access­ible Cre­at­ive, Typo Cre­at­ive, whichever dir­ec­tion you feel is most import­ant for your company.

    Okay, thats my $0.35. Good luck with nam­ing your company!

  48. Adrian said on: February 10th, 2007 at 9:09 am

    design­markup

    design:focus

    designre­mark

    mark-able

  49. Neil said on: February 10th, 2007 at 4:47 pm

    Boulton Won­der­ers

    <not ser­i­ous>

    <the thought made me laugh though>

  50. Wim said on: February 10th, 2007 at 7:35 pm

    Stu­dio MB

  51. Cole Henley said on: February 11th, 2007 at 3:30 am

    nuts and boults

    typnosis/typenosis

  52. Cole Henley said on: February 11th, 2007 at 4:09 am

    one more:

    text-transform.com/.co.uk

  53. Phil Norton said on: February 11th, 2007 at 8:05 am

    Set up a Ltd busi­ness with a couple of mates a few months ago, and we spent AGES com­ing up with a name. 

    One that I liked was Spark’d, which was obvi­ously inspired by Cord’k, but I liked it as it was to do with spark of inspiration/creativity, it was short, easy to remember… 

    Spark Cre­at­ive

    Spark Design

    Spark Media

    etc etc… 

    But I don’t envy you: it’s one of the toughest decisions to make!! All the very best with it!

  54. Julien said on: February 11th, 2007 at 9:49 am

    Boulton inc.

  55. Rob said on: February 11th, 2007 at 9:52 am

    Mark Boulton & Associates

  56. Emily Goad said on: February 11th, 2007 at 12:56 pm

    MB Vis­ion

  57. Barb said on: February 11th, 2007 at 1:08 pm

    All are avail­able as .com 

    Designs Eleven

    Grids Eleven

    Grids 11 Design

    Eleven Grids Design 

    The “eleven?” From your street address. 

    Good luck!

  58. Internetfirma said on: February 11th, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    Boah, its really cool, 2.0 design!

  59. Erik said on: February 11th, 2007 at 3:43 pm

    I’m exper­i­en­cing the same atm. I need to find a catchy name for my busi­ness ánd my band.. 

    heh poor me.

    I agree with Mark Otto. What works for Ralph Lauren, should work for you too. 

    Don’t use a name that’s got ‘design’ in it, it makes you sound ama­teur­ish IMO. Like those 14 year olds like to call their ‘design com­pany with corny names. Things like Dragon Design and such. 

    Oth­er­wise go with some­thing that relates to your (and mine, you star­ted my type-fetishism) love for type. 2em or some­thing, just because it sounds nice. 

    /ignore spelling

  60. John Schroedl said on: February 11th, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    Aurora Boultealis

  61. joe said on: February 11th, 2007 at 8:59 pm

    boulondesign.co.uk

  62. Elliot Schoemaker said on: February 12th, 2007 at 12:09 am

    Moulton?

    Moulton Design(s)

    Moulton Cre­ations

    Moulton Type! 

    Boy, I could go on—but I think you get the idea! 

    Per­haps a play on the obvious: 

    Mark 5?

    Mach 5? 

    I’d come up with more cre­at­ive ones, but I couldn’t quite be bothered read­ing what’s been done in the 60+ com­ments above!

  63. Chris Hunt said on: February 12th, 2007 at 2:12 am

    I agree with the people who sug­gest you stick with your own name — it’s been work­ing for you thus far, why change it? 

    It’s dif­fi­cult for read­ers here to come up with a good name (though many of the sug­ges­tions above are pretty good), since we only know what you post about, rather than what your busi­ness is about. Still, the idea that popped into my head when I read your post was “Grid­works”, so I’ll throw that into the ring even though I think you should use your name instead.

  64. paul haine said on: February 12th, 2007 at 3:35 am

    “Sexual Chocol­ate”

  65. Mark Boulton said on: February 12th, 2007 at 3:38 am

    Paul: That is *so* the win­ning entry! ;)

  66. Brett Dickinson said on: February 12th, 2007 at 6:14 am

    Bolt On Design 

    (I’m see­ing images of nuts and bolts, some­how integ­rated into design, art… 

    Bolt­ing on the Design aspect of a com­pany business. 

    And a kind of play on your name. 

    Brett

  67. Erik said on: February 12th, 2007 at 6:15 am

    Chris Hunt: You just want that iPod, dont you? ;)

  68. Brett Dickinson said on: February 12th, 2007 at 6:27 am

    Hell yeah, ;-)

  69. Edward Kay said on: February 12th, 2007 at 8:17 am

    Whatever you choose, ensure it’s easy to say and under­stand, espe­cially on the ‘phone. That goes for the domain name too. 

    The spelling should be unam­bigu­ous too. 

    Although I like emB (Design), you’d soon tire of say­ing E, M …for mother… B, all one word etc.

  70. Alex Ciobica said on: February 12th, 2007 at 11:57 am

    How about “Ascend­ing Creative” ?

  71. catherine said on: February 12th, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    I’m offer­ing either “Boulton Design”

    or

    “Mark Boulton Stu­dio”

    Because:

    * your philo­sophy (as I read it) is about straight­for­ward, dir­ect design that doesn’t do clever-clever for the sake of it, hence a dir­ect name; and

    * the names pick up on your exist­ing name recog­ni­tion; and

    * both are ambigu­ous enough about the num­ber of people in the com­pany (1? 2? 200?) they can serve you no mat­ter what you decide to do re growth.

  72. mat said on: February 12th, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    artbo

  73. boyd wiebe said on: February 12th, 2007 at 2:16 pm

    Cue from the Wife; Har­mony Studios

  74. bryan said on: February 12th, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    The Design Type 

    Stu­dio Type 

    The Exposed Type 

    Expli­cit Type

  75. Marko Mihelcic said on: February 13th, 2007 at 2:18 am

    [db] Boulton Design 

    Boulton & Boulton

    :)

  76. Brett Dickinson said on: February 13th, 2007 at 2:23 am

    Umm BOLT ON design, doesn;t that sound the same as Boulton Design? 

    ;-) 

    I came up with that first..

    Now where’s my iPod?

  77. Mark Boulton said on: February 13th, 2007 at 2:39 am

    Erm, just for cla­ri­fic­a­tion guys, ‘Mark Boulton Design’, or the shortened form ‘Boulton Design’ (and deriv­at­ives thereof), was the ori­ginal name for the com­pany (point your browser to markboultondesign.co.uk for proof of that. 

    Keep ‘em com­ing though. There have been some good sug­ges­tions so far, but there isn’t a win­ner yet.

  78. Graham Sanders said on: February 13th, 2007 at 2:53 am

    How about:

    marky­markandthe­funky­bunch

    remark­abledesign

    markupdesign 

    or on a ser­i­ous note base it on a typo­graphic term

    http://www.adobe.com/uk/type/topics/glossary.html

    baseline design

    emdash design

    ellip­sis design

    white space design

  79. Brett Dickinson said on: February 13th, 2007 at 3:02 am

    wibble

  80. Richard said on: February 13th, 2007 at 3:10 am

    Clear Path Design

    Cru­cial Pixel Design

  81. Lucian Lature said on: February 13th, 2007 at 3:32 am

    Arche­Type Design — http://www.archetype.com is avail­able

    Mark­Type Design — http://www.marktype.com is available

  82. Timbo said on: February 13th, 2007 at 5:12 am

    Web Dev­ilry (Design Thinking)

  83. Eoghan said on: February 13th, 2007 at 6:39 am

    Luci­dio Design

  84. Manutius said on: February 13th, 2007 at 8:05 am

    First Thought

    ARK as in m-ARK – (ark of the cov­en­ant – Its primary func­tion was to give detailed instruc­tions about what was good and what was forbidden)given your love of divine pro­por­tion. I’m not sug­gest­ing you have a God complex. 

    Second Thunk

    Ana­gram – Rank Bum Tool, sur­pris­ingly the URL is still available!

  85. Ashley said on: February 13th, 2007 at 8:12 am

    I vote for Five Simple Steps. It’s straight­for­ward, help­ful, clean and also some­thing you’re known for already.

  86. Edward Kay said on: February 13th, 2007 at 8:19 am

    You may be inter­ested in an art­icle on how to name your com­pany that’s just appeared on Vitamin.

  87. Tom Harman said on: February 13th, 2007 at 9:40 am

    http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/biz/how-to-name-your-company

  88. mike said on: February 13th, 2007 at 11:11 am

    bark

    dandy

    belly

    fin­ger

  89. Jonathan said on: February 13th, 2007 at 11:33 am

    Boulton Com­mu­nic­a­tions

    boultoncommunications.com 

    Says exactly what it does on the tin, but also has a little play on words (bolt-on) if you’re into that kind of thing. 

    Mark, 

    For­get the subtle design related names and web 2 influ­enced rub­bish and keep it clear and con­cise. And who­ever said “busi­nesses named after the founder fail sig­ni­fic­antly more often than busi­nesses that are not” should be poked in the eye with a very rusty nail.

    Just a few of the greatest eponym­ous busi­nesses in recent his­tory:

    - Ogilvy Mather

    - Young Rubicam

    - BBH

    - M&S

    - Eric­sson

    - Ford

    - Porsche

    - adi­das

    - John Deere

    - The list could go on forever… 

    I totally under­stand your dilemma as I’m there right now myself, but as cli­ents and any­one worth their salt will tell you – it’s much less about the name you have and much more about the bene­fits and qual­ity of work you provide. 

    Keep it strong and estab­lished over the latest trend, every time.

  90. John Arthur said on: February 13th, 2007 at 2:07 pm

    Mark’s Crop Designs 

    Mark’s Regis­tra­tion Designs. 

    Some sort of play on Printer’s marks (I’d prob­ably avoid bleed marks, though). 

    And I didn’t do the research I could have, but I know that mark­scrop com and co uk are open. 

    Unfor­tu­nately, it’s a bit print-centric. How­ever, there could be some fun logo play (esp. with regis­tra­tion marks). 

    JA

  91. boyd wiebe said on: February 13th, 2007 at 3:03 pm

    Switch Com­mu­nic­a­tions

    switch­com­dot­com

    switchcom.co.uk

  92. boyd wiebe said on: February 13th, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    Sorry, just dis­covered that switch is not ori­ginal to the UK

  93. Graham Sanders said on: February 13th, 2007 at 4:37 pm

    Just hit me, why not remove the 5 and have: 

    simplesteps

    simple-steps

    simplestepscre­at­ive

    simplestepsdesign 

    or 

    problem-solving

    problem-solved

    problem-solvers 

    or 

    i-may-have-a-manc-accent-but-deep-down-im-a-lovely-chap.com

  94. boyd wiebe said on: February 13th, 2007 at 5:34 pm

    Wavelength Cre­at­ive

    Prism Graph­ics

    Optic Nerve Designs

  95. gray said on: February 14th, 2007 at 3:49 am

    Visual Jazz

  96. Manutius said on: February 14th, 2007 at 5:52 am

    Ker­nel

    Kernel(ing) – from which kern­ing is derived

    Ker­nel – the cent­ral or most import­ant part of any­thing

    Ker­nel – is the cent­ral com­pon­ent of most com­puter oper­at­ing sys­tems

    Ker­nel – the centre of a nut (a half open wal­nut look­ing like a brain) hmmm

  97. Guy Carberry said on: February 14th, 2007 at 6:34 am

    Spice­berg Lettuce

  98. Gary Bristow said on: February 14th, 2007 at 7:01 am

    lime

    ember

    bute

    barry island

  99. Ben said on: February 14th, 2007 at 7:57 am

    Mark,

    A use­ful art­icle if you haven’t spot­ted it already ;) 

    http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/biz/how-to-name-your-company

  100. Tim McElwee said on: February 14th, 2007 at 7:58 am

    Of your work that I’ve seen, everything is well thought out and simple. So: 

    Think Simple

    Simple Thought

    Lucid Thought

    I think the last one is a win­ner, but I have a ves­ted interest in the outcome.

  • Me

    Hello. My name is Mark Boulton. I’m a designer, an author, a speaker and I run a small design agency where we work with lovely cli­ents and pub­lish books as we go. This is my blog.

  • More of me

  • Publications

    Design­ing for the Web
    Start­ing from £19 + VAT for a PDF Down­load. £29 for a full col­our paperback.
  • Where I work

    Mark Boulton Design
    A small design stu­dio doing good things for nice clients.
    Five Simple Steps
    Pub­lish­ing easy to read design books.
  • See me speak

    @Media 2010
    June 8th — 11th, Lon­don, UK.
    Drupal­Con 2010
    August 23th — 27th, Copen­ha­gen, Denmark.
    dCon­struct 2010: Design 1010 workshop
    Septem­ber 1st, Brighton, UK.
    Web­d­a­gene
    Septem­ber 29th — Octo­ber 1st, Oslo, Norway
    Web Developers Conference
    Octo­ber 27th, Bris­tol, UK.
    New Adven­tures in Web Design
    Janu­ary 20th 2011, Not­ting­ham, UK.
  • Copyright © 1999–2010 Mark Boulton. Made with an Apple Mac in Wales. Running on WordPress and VPS.net.