The personal disquiet of

Mark Boulton

March 16th, 2007

Annual Jaunt Across the Pond

SXSW 07 logoWell, it’s all over for another year. This was my third year at SxSW and des­pite being ridicu­lously sick dur­ing the first couple of days, it was prob­ably the most inter­est­ing. I’m choos­ing my words care­fully there. 

There is little doubt that SxSW is grow­ing at an alarm­ing rate. I heard some people say there were close to five thou­sand attendees to the Inter­act­ive Fest­ival alone this year. That’s an awful lot of people. In fact, for the first time, I wasn’t allowed into some of the pan­els due to lack of space. That hasn’t happened to me before and this year it happened three times. Too many people or just small rooms? 

Too much Navel-Gazing?

I don’t mean to gripe, really. Maybe it’s the jet-lag, but I have come away from this years SxSW feel­ing a little odd. On one hand, it’s nice to see more pan­els being devoted to graphic design, user exper­i­ence and con­tent. As Zeld­man poin­ted out yes­ter­day, I too felt a little out of place last year hav­ing not recently launched, been bought out, or selling my latest, greatest web-app. This year, there was more talk of the craft of web design and I think that is great. 

The other side of me is a little dis­ap­poin­ted though. Not with the qual­ity of the con­fer­ence but with a gen­eral feel­ing of navel-gazing with the attend­ing crowds and pan­el­ists. More so than pre­vi­ous years, I felt a lot of the pan­els I atten­ded were preach­ing to the con­ver­ted, or worse still, to your mates. Maybe I was guilty of that too? And what is the point of that? 

All grumpy­ness aside, I really enjoyed catch­ing up with old friends and meet­ing new ones. This is really the high­light of SxSW for me. Even though I didn’t make it out to many of the parties whilst I was still nurs­ing my sick throat, I did man­age to make it to the bowl­ing (where a few of us man­age to sur­prise ourselves and make it through to the second round), the Ellis­Lab party and of course the Great Brit­ish Booze Up.

Grids and Typography

The present­a­tions I had to give went well. First off, Grids Are Good, went down a storm on Sat­urday. I just wish we had more time. All credit really must go to Khoi on this for the amaz­ing amount of pre­par­a­tion he put in. Like I said, I was still nurs­ing a raging head­ache, a fever and a sore throat and it really was touch and go in the Green Room. Never-the-less, it went well. 

Web Typo­graphy Sucks, presen­ted with Rich, went very well on Tues­day. I was feel­ing much bet­ter, relaxed and con­fid­ent and the time flew by. I was pleased we’d left plenty of time at the end for questions—there really didn’t seem to be enough of that this year. The slides are up online and the pod­cast will fol­low no doubt.

Next year?

I’m look­ing for­ward to next year. I’m hop­ing for a few things:

So, if I didn’t meet you this year, then I hope to next year. If I did, nice to see you again. Just a shame we have to wait a whole year.

10 Responses to “Annual Jaunt Across the Pond”

  1. Brian Artka said on: March 16th, 2007 at 12:04 pm

    This was my first SXSWi and I went home over­loaded with inform­a­tion; and not just from the pan­els. I enjoyed the social events more than the con­fer­ence itself; meet­ing new people was a blast. 

    I wish your grids ses­sion was longer, there was so much to take in at one time, but the power ses­sion tim­ing, in my opin­ion, did not work out. Lets hope they dont try that next year. The fact that I had to walk all the way around the con­fer­ence venue to some elev­at­ors to get to another room was a hassle as well. 

    I did not get to meet you, nor see your web typo­graphy ses­sion (I did read the slides though, very nice), but there is always next year. Lets hope a cold doesnt hit year this time next year! 

    Brian 

    PS(so are you going to get back to the book now? ;P)

  2. Paul said on: March 16th, 2007 at 1:03 pm

    This was my first ever SXSW (hav­ing only atten­ded two @media shows before that), and must say I had a ball! 

    I was slightly annoyed by the 25 minute length present­a­tions, which to me seemed far too short, and the hour ones some­times felt like they dragged on a little too long. 

    Over­all, I was impressed by the range of top­ics covered, and com­pared to @media, I actu­ally felt there was less preach­ing to the con­ver­ted, but per­haps that’s because I delib­er­ately avoided the pan­els that soun­ded sim­ilar to talks I’ve heard before. 

    Finally, I would just like to add that it was great to finally meet you (and Andy) on the last day, and I hope you have more enjoyable/healthy SXSW next year.

  3. erin said on: March 16th, 2007 at 6:58 pm

    It was lovely to finally meet you after hav­ing read your work online for so long. I missed the grids present­a­tion, but I thought the typo­graphy talk was excellent—and spe­cific­ally, that you and Richard did a great job provid­ing use­ful inform­a­tion for both ser­i­ous typo­graphy folks and rel­at­ive beginners. 

    This year was my first SXSW, and I was a bit bowled over by the num­ber of people and pan­els; next year I’m going to try and get to more of the pan­els that seem out of my area. Car­rie Bickner-Zeldman’s digital pre­ser­va­tion panel was great and quite unlike any­thing else I saw this year, and I wish I’d seen a few more of the other unusual talks.

  4. Mark Boulton said on: March 17th, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Brian: Yep, the book is on my list. Believe me, there’s so much in the pipeline at the moment, that I need to get that done. Soon. 

    Paul: It was great to meet you too Paul. I agree, I hope they ditch the 25 minute thing, but if they don’t, I hope the pan­el­ists (me included here), take note that a new format requires a slightly dif­fer­ent approach. 

    erin: Thanks, glad you enjoyed the present­a­tion. It was great to finally meet you too. Next year, I’m also going to make a real effort to go to some pan­els out­side of my area. I was guilty of attend­ing too many design focussed pan­els this year.

  5. Eric Carroll said on: March 17th, 2007 at 11:23 am

    It seems a lot of us attenders felt the same way. It was my first time to attend SXSW and, truth be told, I was a bit dis­ap­poin­ted in a lot of the panels. 

    Hon­estly, yours and Khoi’s panel on grids was great. I never knew you were feel­ing so bad, but you guys did an incred­ible job. Part of me wished it was much longer, but part of me thinks it was the right length because it forced me to pay atten­tion. I am actu­ally imple­ment­ing what I learned about grids on a new pro­ject and it is work­ing beautifully!

    Most of what I liked about the pan­els was the pan­el­ists that told stor­ies, what they learned from it and the basic prin­ciple for the rest of us to take to heart. Some of the pan­el­ists were rather dull, though, as they ten­ded to be too tech­nical or just provide stor­ies without any “les­son learned” to share. 

    Out­side of that, did any­one else enjoy the Wire­less Dial-up Inter­net access as much as I did? :P 

    I did, how­ever, meet a lot of great people and that was the best thing about my first exper­i­ence at SXSW.

  6. NatalieMac said on: March 18th, 2007 at 8:08 pm

    Wow — so many of us were at SXSW for the first time this year. Too bad I didn’t get to meet more of you! 

    I atten­ded the Typo­graphy panel and thought it was one of the best pan­els I atten­ded. SXSW was amaz­ing and I’m def­in­itely going back next year!

  7. dryan said on: March 20th, 2007 at 2:40 pm

    I loved the pod­cast of Web Typo­graphy Sucks.  I found it much easier to grasp on a second listen when viewed along with the slides.  Would you be inter­ested in an enhanced AAC ver­sion with the slides in the file as well? I’d be happy to do that.  Just send me an email.

  8. Gwilym said on: March 21st, 2007 at 4:52 am

    Enjoyed the pod­cast for Web Typo­graphy Sucks, par­tic­u­larly read­ing along with the slides (it’s like a little bit of SXSW came to my home). I’d been read­ing the bits on grid design with Khoi & you as well, and had two quick questions:

    - When you’re look­ing at the ver­tical rhythm, I can see the bits with line-height for head­ings to make them take one unit (like the example of a head­ing at 18px, and the ver­tical space at 18px, so a line-height of 1em). What do you do if the head­ing is big­ger than a unit? 

    - For grid design and hanging punc­tu­ation, are there times when hanging bul­let points etc. can cause them to bleed in to another column, or should you make the gut­ters big enough to avoid this happening? 

    Any­ways, enjoy­ing read­ing the site — thanks for mak­ing all this con­tent available.

  9. Paul Fresty said on: March 22nd, 2007 at 7:42 am

    There is no ques­tion at all in my mind that both the grid and typo­graphy ses­sions were by FAR the best ones that I atten­ded the entire 5 days I was at SXSW. 

    No dis­respect to the other pan­el­ists in other ses­sions, but your two ses­sions left me eager to get back to my com­puter, thirsty to learn more, and gave me ACTUAL take-away inform­a­tion that I could take REAL NOTES on. 

    I don’t mind dis­cus­sion pan­els, but many of them quickly degen­er­ate into unre­hearsed com­edy routines. And although I respect dif­fer­ing opin­ions on things as diverse as high-class vs. low-class web design, I really enjoy learn­ing and hoped to learn as much as pos­sible at SXSW. 

    I kept recall­ing my exper­i­ence at Pho­toShop World in Boston a few years ago. Every ses­sion was the kind where you LEARNED some­thing. I took notes. And I always left with at least ONE nug­get I could take back and use immediately. 

    So thank you so much for your inform­at­ive pan­els. This is inform­a­tion I can use. 

    It also makes it FAR easier for me to come back to my office and say… this is what I LEARNED (they like to feel I wasn’t just wast­ing their money there… ima­gine). Instead I have to try to relay what some designer thinks about design­ing for the lower classes. Who cares?

    There is cer­tainly a place for the­ory and opin­ion at SXSW, but I think the powers that be should intro­duce more “les­son” type ses­sions like yours were. They changed the way I do things. THAT is the point… isn’t it? 

    Thank you for ener­giz­ing my cre­ativ­ity again. Your two ses­sions were the best. Easily.

  10. paul said on: March 29th, 2007 at 11:08 am

    Use­ful presentation. 

    Can I ask why you use a base body type set­ting of 12px in your present­a­tion with all the com­plex em set­tings — and why not say the 62.5% set­ting to get a base set­ting of 10pt ? 

    Just curi­ous — I’m try­ing to decide which method to use.

  • Me

    Hello. My name is Mark Boulton. I’m a designer, an author, a speaker and I run a small design agency where we work with lovely cli­ents and pub­lish books as we go. This is my blog.

  • More of me

  • Publications

    Design­ing for the Web
    Start­ing from £19 + VAT for a PDF Down­load. £29 for a full col­our paperback.
  • Where I work

    Mark Boulton Design
    A small design stu­dio doing good things for nice clients.
    Five Simple Steps
    Pub­lish­ing easy to read design books.
  • See me speak

    @Media 2010
    June 8th — 11th, London.
    Web­d­a­gene
    Septem­ber 29th — Octo­ber 1st, Oslo.
  • Copyright © 1999–2009 Mark Boulton. Made with an Apple Mac in Wales. Powered by WordPress and hosted by Media Temple.