Journal
CSS Eleven
Last week, Andy Clarke announced a new CSS group I’m thrilled to be part of: CSS Eleven.
I’m going to leave the detailed explanation to Andy, but in a nutshell, the group is going to help the ‘W3C’s CSS Working Group to better deliver the tools needed for tomorrow’s web’. I’m particularly interested in having the opportunity to be involved in the several layout modules which have thus far been proposed.
Andy’s rounded up a fantastic bunch of designers and developers here. Hopefully we’ll have the collective clout to influence things in a positive way in the months to come.
Commenting is not available in this section entry.
Most recent entries
- Don’t screw with conventions
- Design isn’t about tools
- Where’s the D in D&AD?
- Coolspotters: Where people and products meet
- Alys Rose Boulton
- abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
- From Poly to Pole
- Ten Crimes Against Web Typography (and how to avoid them)
- Start Your Own Business
- Coolspotters and Garcia Media
Categories
Search
Journal feeds
Books
Stuff I like
Powered by Expression Engine



I'm a graphic designer from near Cardiff in the UK. I've been a designer for over ten years now and primarily work on the web. I'm still partial to a bit of print every now and then though. I used to work for
Comments
Finally. The most interesting thing about this is that I now have eleven sources reporting on the project, which should pretty much guarantee some insight into how things are going. An article about dealing with the W3C should be an interesting read, also.
Hopefully things will get done right this time. Best of luck to you.
Kari Pätilä
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 4:59 am
Very cool, and yes, layout models!
I always find it interesting how even simple CSS layouts seem complex and hard to beginners, which I think is why many resort to old, predictable tables. :)
Good luck!
Olav
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 5:13 am
Jonathon Snook. Interesting.
Wolf
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 5:19 am
Whoever is setting the website up should really get on with the ExpressionEngine installation. The install.php file is wide open at present!
Geof Harries
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 5:41 am
Just wanted to point out the same, I get the EE installation wizard, quite creepy. =) Besides that, I think it’s really great to have such a resource.
Cheers,
Arne
Arne
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 5:53 am
Yep, same here. sends me to the ExpressionEngine installation page. more specifically to:
http://www.csseleven.com/install.php
Christian
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 6:09 am
Just one bit of advise — don’t let the WG try and over-complicate and over-engineer what you need. That’s what causes specifications to take even longer than they need take, and never get implemented by browsers.
Geoffrey Sneddon
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 7:57 am
Come on… the site is up, but the install scriptis still wide open.
Kari Pätilä
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 10:43 am
OK so my lesson for today is… don’t start installing Expression Engine then go to a client meeting half way through. You can see why I’m not technical ;) All is now working as it should.
Andy Clarke
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 12:05 pm
What a stellar group. I hope that your collective input is put to action.
dryan
Mon 8th Oct 2007
at 4:27 pm
Looks cool, Mark…
What exactly will you be doing, and what are we the public going to see (am I right in thinking that the current site is just the one page)?
Barney Carroll
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 5:06 am
Is it cynical of me to think that this is just another vehicle for a goup of connected friends to generate more business/book/speaking opportunities for themselves?
I guess we’ll be able to judge that on the effect it has on the W3C.
Frank
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 6:20 am
Frank, sadly, because the CSS WG operate privately, we can’t see what affect it actually has: we can only guess based upon the end products.
Geoffrey Sneddon
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 7:57 am
Frank: Ouch. Yeah, that is cynical, and to be honest, you’re not the first person to say that.
If I may speak for Andy Clarke for just one minute. Andy, who is already a member of the CSS Working Group, has identified a need for visual designers to be involved in the creation of CSS specs to ensure they include the tools and terminology designers are used to.
He asked a bunch of people who he felt had the chops to help the W3C deliver a CSS spec that reflected the requirements of designers. Now, aside from taking an open-source approach to this (which we all know wouldn’t work - too many cooks), how would you have done it any differently?
Mark Boulton
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 7:58 am
I think even just making the mailing list archives publicly accessible would help, though doing such a thing would most likely turn www-style into a continuation of what would likely be called public-style.
Geoffrey Sneddon
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 8:04 am
Having elaborated a bit in your last post I’m quite a fan of the notion.
Everybody and their dog has to have an opinion about the css3 group list, but focus groups within are very important. As it stands it’s far too often simply a case of highly technical spec suggestions attached to the most banal use cases. Visual designers working together within the context has to be a plus.
Barney Carroll
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 9:01 am
@ Anonymous Frank:
“Is it cynical of me to think that this is just another vehicle for a goup of connected friends to generate more business/book/speaking opportunities for themselves?”
I think that Mark summed up my thoughts perfectly.
Now; if it’s foolish to think that ‘a goup of connected friends’ can communicate better than a disconnected industry, often at odds with the W3C - then I’m a fool.
If it’s simple minded to think that ‘a goup of connected friends’ who are also some of the best visual designers, coders, writers and speakers can use their experience to help the W3C get what we need from CSS3 - then I’m a simple minded fool.
Now, have you something constructive to add or are you just an anonymous twerp?
No? I thought not.
Andy Clarke
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 5:55 pm
Oh, and in case anyone thought that I intended my last comment to come across as a criticism of people who are all to eager to make disrespectful comments without the balls to leave a publically identifiable URL (blogging’s equivelant of a drive-by shooting); it was.
Andy Clarke
Tue 9th Oct 2007
at 6:04 pm
Hahaha.
Yeah, but we know where you live Andy! I still think it might be worth putting up a little description of the purpose of the group on the site. Frank jumped the gun a bit but it did take the discourse in the comments on a blog post about the actual site for us to get something like a clear idea as to what the purpose of CSS Eleven is.
As it stands, the site seems to indicate the top stars of web design are getting together to make a film or rob a casino. :)
Barney Carroll
Wed 10th Oct 2007
at 1:16 am
This sounds very promising ! I read most of the 11’s blogs etc so know that if they can be involved and listened to, that I will have a better time in the future as a web based worker. I misplaced my car stereo yesterday and its called Frank, i hope he didnt get on my laptop again.
Zak
Wed 10th Oct 2007
at 8:42 am
I still think it might be worth putting up a little description of the purpose of the group on the site. I agree with Barney it can help promote it I like the current description of 11 and I know them from they blogs that I read and sometimes comment. Congratulations!
Tomasz Gorski
Wed 10th Oct 2007
at 5:21 pm
Come on guys lighten up a bit… These 11 Designers are without a doubt pioneers in CSS and standards based web design. Their knowledge and expertise has been both invaluable and inspirational right across the industry. The film reference is, I imagine, them having a lighthearted laugh… nothing wrong with that!
And anyway, what’s wrong with a bit of self-promotion… it’s actually a big part of a Designer’s activity. Their ultimate aim and objective will have a positive impact on the future of web design and standards and we should embrace, encourage and be grateful for their continuous endeavours.
John
Thu 11th Oct 2007
at 2:18 am
It looks like it’s a perfect team. Waiting for your standards!
Maxime
Mon 15th Oct 2007
at 5:02 am
I feel that one of the biggest problems we’ve got in terms of third party dealings with the W3C is the problem of representation; who represents who?
The “CSS Eleven” appears to be going about things the right way. That is, they’ve found 11 like-minded people who would like their needs and suggestions conveyed to the W3C for inclusion in the future CSS drafts. They’re willing to work together to try and help the W3C deliver something which caters (at least in some part) to their needs.
They don’t represent the industry as a whole; they represent themselves. It’s a shift away from the usual “we represent everyone” approach.
At least, that’s the boundaries that I *hope* the CSS Eleven operates within.
Nathan de Vries
Mon 15th Oct 2007
at 6:15 am
Sweet! Can’t wait to hear more… Congrats!
Sherwin Techico
Tue 16th Oct 2007
at 1:59 pm
What can happen in the next few month?
Andrey M
Wed 17th Oct 2007
at 12:34 am
How are these people are? I don’t know anybody
Cox
Wed 24th Oct 2007
at 11:16 pm
What will be the next technology in web design, after CSS?
Prestito
Thu 25th Oct 2007
at 3:39 am