<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five simple steps to better typography &#8211; Part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3</link>
	<description>The Personal Disquiet of Mark Boulton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five Steps to Better Typography with Mark Boulton &#124; Colin Harman</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-5337</link>
		<dc:creator>Five Steps to Better Typography with Mark Boulton &#124; Colin Harman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-5337</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 3: Ligatures [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 3: Ligatures [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligatures &#171; Life through Design</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-5278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligatures &#171; Life through Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-5278</guid>
		<description>[...] / Five simple steps to better typography &#8211; 3 by Mark Boulton / Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] / Five simple steps to better typography &#8211; 3 by Mark Boulton / Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ligatures on the Web &#171; Adam D. Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-5235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ligatures on the Web &#171; Adam D. Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 09:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-5235</guid>
		<description>[...] Five Simples Steps to Better Typography: Ligatures [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Five Simples Steps to Better Typography: Ligatures [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I?m wondering when we?ll read one of your type postings that is actually error-free.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You can use f-ligatures in HTML. You also don?t even need character entities; I?m sure you are familiar with Unicode.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Once again, ?, ?, and the like are not ligatures but digraphs, and eth, thorn, and estset are neither of those things. (Tell me: Which two characters are combined to make each of those? Do you think s+s=??)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There?s already an &lt;a href=&quot;http://fawny.org/blog/2003/12/#f.u&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;f-ligature test file available&lt;/a&gt; if you wish.

&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I?m wondering when we?ll read one of your type postings that is actually error-free.
</p>
<p>
You can use f-ligatures in HTML. You also don?t even need character entities; I?m sure you are familiar with Unicode.
</p>
<p>
Once again, ?, ?, and the like are not ligatures but digraphs, and eth, thorn, and estset are neither of those things. (Tell me: Which two characters are combined to make each of those? Do you think s+s=??)
</p>
<p>
There?s already an <a href="http://fawny.org/blog/2003/12/#f.u" rel="nofollow">f-ligature test file available</a> if you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Remember that the ampersand (&amp;) is a ligature of the letters in &lt;em&gt;et&lt;/em&gt;, the latin word for and. If you use the logogram in HTML you should always use the character reference: &lt;strong&gt;&amp;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This explains why some rather old-fashioned people, myself included, use &#8220;&amp;c.&#8221; instead of &#8220;etc.&#8221; to denote &lt;em&gt;et cetera&lt;/em&gt;.

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In all other cases the ampersand shouldn&#8217;t be used in body text. It should be used in company names, however.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember that the ampersand (&amp;) is a ligature of the letters in <em>et</em>, the latin word for and. If you use the logogram in HTML you should always use the character reference: <strong>&amp;amp;</strong>
</p>
<p>
This explains why some rather old-fashioned people, myself included, use &#8220;&amp;c.&#8221; instead of &#8220;etc.&#8221; to denote <em>et cetera</em>.</p>
<p>
In all other cases the ampersand shouldn&#8217;t be used in body text. It should be used in company names, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2005 06:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The OpenType support by most Adobe programs these days is wonderful! (i.e. Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To use them is as simple as turning on a switch in the character/type palette. For example, in the new Illustrator CS2, the Character palette is partnered with a little known palette named &#8220;OpenType.&#8221; There, you can change all the settings available for a given OpenType font including, but not limited to, ligatures, expanded ligatures, swashes, and small caps.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You can get yourself up to speed by checking out &lt;a href=&quot;http://store.adobe.com/type/opentype/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adobe&#8217;s OpenType reference material&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
By the way, thank you Mark for such a blessed ray of hope on the dreary landscape that is the web.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OpenType support by most Adobe programs these days is wonderful! (i.e. Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign)
</p>
<p>
To use them is as simple as turning on a switch in the character/type palette. For example, in the new Illustrator CS2, the Character palette is partnered with a little known palette named &#8220;OpenType.&#8221; There, you can change all the settings available for a given OpenType font including, but not limited to, ligatures, expanded ligatures, swashes, and small caps.
</p>
<p>
You can get yourself up to speed by checking out <a href="http://store.adobe.com/type/opentype/" rel="nofollow">Adobe&#8217;s OpenType reference material</a>.</p>
<p>
By the way, thank you Mark for such a blessed ray of hope on the dreary landscape that is the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 00:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/block/alphabetic_presentation_forms/fontsupport.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Font Support for Unicode Block &#8216;Alphabetic Presentation Forms&#8217;&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/block/alphabetic_presentation_forms/fontsupport.htm" rel="nofollow">Font Support for Unicode Block &#8216;Alphabetic Presentation Forms&#8217;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Boulton</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Boulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 05:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;dru&lt;/strong&gt; - Thanks. I&#8217;ve been thinking of getting this stuff together and offering it as a pdf or something initially. Sounds like a good idea&#8230; ;-)
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>dru</strong> &#8211; Thanks. I&#8217;ve been thinking of getting this stuff together and offering it as a pdf or something initially. Sounds like a good idea&#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dru</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Love the articles. This is a depth in typography that I have not seen and find very refreshing. It would be cool if you defined all of these terms and had them availble as a seperate resource/book.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the articles. This is a depth in typography that I have not seen and find very refreshing. It would be cool if you defined all of these terms and had them availble as a seperate resource/book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Olsson</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Olsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 19:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;XHTML has nothing to do with it, although some old browsers may have problems with hexadecimal character references. So instead of &#xFB00; you could use the decimal notation: &#64256;.

&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The other points in Emery Snyder&#8217;s comment are valid, though.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XHTML has nothing to do with it, although some old browsers may have problems with hexadecimal character references. So instead of &amp;#xFB00; you could use the decimal notation: &amp;#64256;.</p>
<p>
The other points in Emery Snyder&#8217;s comment are valid, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan White</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 04:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/04/five-simple-steps-to-better-typography-part-3/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Heyyy&#8230; you&#8217;ve been busy on your blog! Very cool stuff here, that appears to have sprung up overnight!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yeah, my degree is just in Design (in general). Typography is a personal interest, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t my major focus of study.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heyyy&#8230; you&#8217;ve been busy on your blog! Very cool stuff here, that appears to have sprung up overnight!
</p>
<p>
Yeah, my degree is just in Design (in general). Typography is a personal interest, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t my major focus of study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

