Journal
Five Simple Steps to Typesetting on the web: Introduction
- Posted on: January 25, 2006
- In: Simple Steps
- Comments closed
It's been quite a while since the last Simple Steps series, but this new series of articles has been brewing for a while. Before I go into the first installment I'd like to clarify what exactly I mean by Typesetting and how that differs from Design, Typographic Design or Typography. Each 'Simple Step' will be just that, clear simple rule(s) to follow.
I feel that Typographic Design is such a large field in the practice of design that some of the constituent parts need a bit of attention. Take Type Design for example. The font industry is big business, and rightly so, but to many people this is what typography is; choosing a font. That's it. My typography is done, move on to the colours. Hang on one minute. You've forgotten Typesetting.
Typesetting, as defined by Dictionary.com, is:
To set (written material) into type; compose.
Not very enlightening, but the word 'compose', used in this context is an important word.
Composition. Take a look at the definition. Typesetting is in some pretty impressive company, but I like this one: Arrangement of artistic parts so as to form a unified whole.
.
Typesetting has a rich history in the craft of the printing trade where compositors grafted, by hand and later by machines, to produce printed material. Then, along came desktop publshing and things changed slightly. The basic principles (I'll get onto some of them) remained the same, but something was lost in translation. Typesetting was no longer being done by skilled tradesmen—Compositors—But by Graphic Designers, who arguably didn't have the skills, but were cheap because they worked on labour saving computers. And so, from the late 1980's onwards, Typesetting suffered and as a result Typography suffered.
This all may be a little melodramatic for the print based world, but things are a whole lot worse on the web. True, there are technical constraints on which font you can have, but as I said, there's more to typography than the font.
Tomorrow, I'll get onto the first Step: The Right Glyph for the Job.
Most recent entries
- Don’t screw with conventions
- Design isn’t about tools
- Where’s the D in D&AD?
- Coolspotters: Where people and products meet
- Alys Rose Boulton
- abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
- From Poly to Pole
- Ten Crimes Against Web Typography (and how to avoid them)
- Start Your Own Business
- Coolspotters and Garcia Media
Categories
Search
Journal feeds
Books
Stuff I like
Powered by Expression Engine



I'm a graphic designer from near Cardiff in the UK. I've been a designer for over ten years now and primarily work on the web. I'm still partial to a bit of print every now and then though. I used to work for
Comments
Oooooh looking for this one!
Paul
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 6:00 pm
Correction: Looking forward to this one - the excitement must have got to me!
Paul
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 6:08 pm
Cool!
Me too!
What about textile in your comments? Would be a lot handier to just type bq. to get a blockquote.
Cheers,
Julian
Julian Schrader
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 6:26 pm
Great introduction. It’s funny though, because just yesterday I was thinking about this. I am also looking forward to this series.
Joe Lencioni
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 6:27 pm
I like the seriousness that you’re approaching this series with. Keep bringing the melodrama!
Dan Mall
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 6:27 pm
Sounds like a great Series. I am looking dorward to it.
Nik Steffen
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 7:07 pm
This promises to be a series worth reading. We will all be back for tomorrow’s installment.
Ben Armstrong
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 9:41 pm
Typography has suffered since the introduction of computerized typesetting. Remember when kerning was “discovered” by designers in the early 80’s? It seemed that every other magazine ad had type so squeezed together you couldn’t read it. Just so they could make the type size larger.
It’s only relatively recently that type is starting to look as good as old-fashioned foundry type (or Monotype) set by someone with some experience. Modern software has eliminated enough of the need for technical knowledge to allow designers to do their thing without too much trouble. Anyone remember Compugraphic? (A pioneer in “phototypesetting” here in the US.)
I look forward to your series.
Rick Holmes
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 11:22 pm
Can’t wait, bring it on!
Steve Williams
Wed 25th Jan 2006
at 11:22 pm
Can’t wait Mark.
As a designer and developer eager to learn about type, I’ve been reading your blog since the “5 Steps To Better Typography”.
It still amazes me that so many designers out there have very little knowledge as regards type so, good job and keep up the good work!
Tim Huegdon
Thu 26th Jan 2006
at 8:56 am
Looking forward to this one Mark.
You make a pertinent comment about the choose it then use it, attitude.
For a while now I’ve been intending to reduce the amount of fonts I have and use the ones left better.
So teach me!
Kev Mears
Thu 26th Jan 2006
at 10:27 am
I’ve been a big follower of your Simple Steps series, and I really cannnot wait for this one :)
Katie
Thu 26th Jan 2006
at 2:53 pm