The personal disquiet of

Mark Boulton

March 23rd, 2005

“It’s only a green stripe at the top”

After being fea­tured by those lovely people at Styleg­ala and CSS Vault I thought it might be a an idea to give a bit of a decon­struc­tion of the design here at markboulton.co.uk. This post was also promp­ted by Narayan over at Eth­er­farm and his great post, “all this fuss over some measly boxes”

So, what I want to decon­struct is the pro­cess I went through to come to this design and hope­fully give some sort of answer to the title of this post.

Any blog, in my opin­ion, is a tricky thing to design. Whilst coup­ling this with the need for a designer to have an online port­fo­lio pres­ence, you begin to find your­self with quite a task on your hands.

I’d bumbled around, design­ing, redesign­ing, redesign­ing whilst drunk only then look­ing at it in the morn­ing and trash­ing it (we’ve all been there right?). This went on, ser­i­ously, for about 2 years with no real dir­ec­tion or iden­tity for my site. I then began a blog, mostly as a dump­ing ground for what i’m think­ing so I can look back and go “oh yeah, I thought that once, look how much i’ve grown” — you know, the usual navel gazing.

Then there’s the tech­nical side. I’d used MT for a good 18 months and was happy with it, sort of, until the spam star­ted rolling in. The thing about MT is, it’s great for a blog, but not so great for a port­fo­lio. That’s where EE stepped in. I’m not going to talk about that here though — i’ve talked enough about that already.

What i’d like to talk about is the design.

Defin­ing the audience

In my day job, I like to think I have a User Centred approach to the work I do (although i’m begin­ning to real­ise the dog­matic aspects of UCD and i’m kind of for­mu­lat­ing another, more agile, meth­od­o­logy which all be writ­ing about soon.) 

So, I think about Users all the time (I hon­estly do, i’m not just say­ing that). With that in mind I was begin­ning to think about the audi­ence of my site and they fall into four cat­egor­ies — Exist­ing cli­ents, poten­tial cli­ents, Journal read­ers and ran­dom vis­it­ors. Design­ing a site, know­ing that much about your audi­ence, really helps cla­rify your think­ing. With that in mind, I needed a site which appears busi­ness like and pro­fes­sional for the cli­ent half, but per­son­able and friendly for the journal part.

Not all cli­ents are web savvy

This is really import­ant, espe­cially amongst the extremely savvy Web Stand­ards Bri­gade. A lot of the time, cli­ents are not the most seasoned inter­net users. They don’t really care whether or not the site is delivered using CSS, XHTML, blah, blah. They really are all bor­ing acronyms to most people. What i’m say­ing is, I really had to think about poten­tial cli­ents and the lan­guage they speak — a lan­guage of profit and loss, sales and budgets, ROI and deliverables.

It’s about Craft

I then approached the design with a clear brief. I know my audi­ence and what i’m try­ing to say to them, but I need to make sure the design shows what i’m about as a designer. To make sure it embod­ies my design ethos and dis­plays my applic­a­tion of the craft.

If you’ve read my Biog, you’ll know i’m tra­di­tion­ally schooled in Typo­graphic Design and am a mem­ber with of the Inter­na­tional Soci­ety of Typo­graphic Design­ers and as such have a self imposed oblig­a­tion to uphold what the Soci­ety stands for. I try to do this will every design I produce.

At the moment I’ve got a thing about Hel­vetica. Maybe it’s the clean lines, or imper­sonal per­fec­tion which appeals. I don’t know, but I think it’s got the most per­fect lower case “e” of any typeface in his­tory, ever. Any­way, I digress. I decided early on that type would be the walls, floor and ceil­ing of this par­tic­u­lar build­ing. Typo­graphy will bind the con­tent together, the struc­ture would be com­prised of let­ters and a del­ic­ate heir­achy of head­ing, sub­head­ing, cap­tions and body copy, rather than col­oured shapes and photography. 

I was get­ting tired of the sat­ur­ated col­ours and the heavy, intric­ate graph­ics which are pro­lif­er­at­ing in the web stand­ards scene. There’s too much visual noise, way too much. I though “what’s the best way of dif­fer­en­ti­at­ing your­self in this increas­ingly noisy space?” well, by being quiet.

btw. If any­one wants me to into more detail regard­ing the grid and typo­graphy, let me know and i’ll work on it.

Col­our as an edu­cated, informed choice

Col­our bugs me. How many times has a cli­ent asked you to make some­thing a par­tic­u­lar col­our because they like it? I wanted the col­our choice for this site to reflect an edu­cated design choice. Green works for me at the moment, it’s not my favour­ite col­our but that’s not to say it won’t change in the future, it might. But at the moment, i’m fine with it.

To con­clude

This isn’t a post aimed at people who don’t like the design. That’s fine, you don’t have to. What I hope I addressed was to explain where I was com­ing from, what my require­ments were and what they are likely to be in the future. Design­ing your own port­fo­lio site as a designer is always incred­ibly dif­fi­cult and it takes some will­power to sit on your hands and just live with a design for a good few months — which is just what I intend to do.

12 Responses to ““It’s only a green stripe at the top””

  1. Glenn said on: March 23rd, 2005 at 8:08 pm

    I’m always inter­ested to know why design­ers did what they did for their final lay­outs and you did a great job writ­ing about your inten­tions with this cur­rent design.  I would actu­ally enjoy another art­icle on your typo­graphy decisions.  I am a big fan of typo­graphy because it is the most import­ant aspect to any design.

  2. Khoi Vinh said on: March 24th, 2005 at 8:32 pm

    Mark, I think I can safely speak for lots of other folks when I say that we’d like to hear more about your design pro­cess, espe­cially how you for­mu­lated the grid. It’s such a beau­ti­fully designed web­log; we want to know how it got that way!

  3. Ryan Nichols said on: March 24th, 2005 at 11:43 pm

    Hey Mark, You know I stand behind your choices. *grin* I agree whole­heartedly about your com­ment on visual noise and stand­ing out. That’s exactly how I felt in devel­op­ing my site earlier this year. I knew that I would rarely sug­gest a graphic heavy worn look for my cli­ents so why present myself that way? 

    I think your site is great and says a lot about your design sens­ib­il­it­ies. It truely says a lot for a designer to design less than more.

  4. Allan White said on: March 25th, 2005 at 2:34 am

    Thanks for shar­ing your design pro­cess and meth­od­o­logy, Mark. Your site is really set­ting the stand­ard for well-done portfolio/blog sites, and also for EE sites. I find myself con­stantly point­ing people to your site to show them what’s pos­sible with EE in the right hands. =)

  5. Mark Boulton said on: March 25th, 2005 at 11:04 am

    Thanks for all your com­ments guys. I feel a bit like the post was dig­ging for com­pli­ments, but I assure you it wasn’t. I really wanted to just give an insight into my think­ing, from a design point of view rather than a tech­nical point of view. 

    I’ve also received quite a few email regard­ing the actual pro­cess of get­ting down and design­ing this site — sketches and all. So, i’ll cer­tainly be work­ing on get­ting that post up soon. 

    There’s so much more I have to say on the sub­ject of typo­graphy and grids. Typo­graphic design has rules, rules which have to be under­stood before being broken. Trouble is, these rules aren’t being taught any­more and they’re in danger of dying along with the lecturers.

    I tried to fol­low the rules with this site (and broke a few along the way, but the most import­ant part is I know why I broke them, right?). 

    Any­way, cath­artic rant over. Grrrrrr

  6. Nigel said on: March 25th, 2005 at 8:13 pm

    Thanks for another inter­est­ing post. I like the clean uncluttered look and IMO your site is one of the best. It puts the focus where it should be, on the con­tent. Glad you’ll be work­ing on a post on your grid and typo­graphy — I’m almost fin­ished Muller-Brockmann’s Grid Sys­tems and am fas­cin­ated with grids. A break­down of the what’s and why’s of your design would be a great “com­pan­ion” case study. Typo­graphy and grids are usu­ally weak areas for design­ers raised on and cocooned by the web. Print design­ers like your­self who share their know­ledge go a long way to edu­cat­ing and improv­ing the rest of us, so thanks.

  7. Adam Bramwell said on: March 27th, 2005 at 5:54 am

    If I can echo Khoi and Nigel’s encour­age­ment for an art­icle on your pro­cess from a grid design per­spect­ive, thanks!

  8. Addison Hall said on: March 29th, 2005 at 5:45 pm

    Graphic design seems to con­tain sev­eral sub-schools of thought that some­times clash with one another. I’ve hon­estly tried to remain open-minded and believe that each of these mind­sets have their appro­pri­ate applications. 

    In my opin­ion, Massimo Vignelli’s work is fas­cin­at­ing and beau­ti­ful, although extremely simple in most cases (at least on the sur­face). But you must con­sider the applic­a­tions he designs for: an archi­tec­tural digest such as Oppos­i­tions requires a dif­fer­ent approach from a Pearl Jam poster. 

    In other words, I see your site as very thought­fully con­struc­ted for your con­tent, Mark. Excel­lent work.

  9. Mark Boulton said on: March 29th, 2005 at 8:35 pm

    I’ll cer­tainly be post­ing about how the grid for this site was cre­ated and also the typo­graphic rela­tion­ships etc. 

    One thing to look out for will be my art­icle in next months Design in Flight. the art­icles called “Feel­ing your way around grids” and cov­ers grid design from a the­or­et­ical standpoint.

  10. Nigel said on: April 8th, 2005 at 6:27 pm

    Mark, Since there’s a lot of interest in your work on grids I thought I’d let you all know that DIF’s April issue has been pub­lished with your art­icle: “Feel­ing your way around grids”. Get it now [small sub­scrip­tion fee required]: http://designinflight.com/issues/2005/apr/12.html

    Ah, I just know it’s going to be a great weekend.

  11. Jason Liske said on: April 10th, 2005 at 2:41 am

    Mark, thanks for shar­ing your thoughts in approach­ing this type of animal.

  12. Mark Boulton said on: April 11th, 2005 at 2:22 pm

    Nigel — thanks for the plug! Hope you enjoy the article. 

    Jason — no problem :-)

  • Me

    Hello. My name is Mark Boulton. I’m a designer, an author, a speaker and I run a small design agency where we work with lovely cli­ents and pub­lish books as we go. This is my blog.

  • More of me

  • Publications

    Design­ing for the Web
    Start­ing from £19 + VAT for a PDF Down­load. £29 for a full col­our paperback.
  • Where I work

    Mark Boulton Design
    A small design stu­dio doing good things for nice clients.
    Five Simple Steps
    Pub­lish­ing easy to read design books.
  • See me speak

    @Media 2010
    June 8th — 11th, Lon­don, UK.
    Drupal­Con 2010
    August 23th — 27th, Copen­ha­gen, Denmark.
    dCon­struct 2010: Design 1010 workshop
    Septem­ber 1st, Brighton, UK.
    Web­d­a­gene
    Septem­ber 29th — Octo­ber 1st, Oslo, Norway
    Web Developers Conference
    Octo­ber 27th, Bris­tol, UK.
    New Adven­tures in Web Design
    Janu­ary 20th 2011, Not­ting­ham, UK.
  • Copyright © 1999–2010 Mark Boulton. Made with an Apple Mac in Wales. Running on WordPress and VPS.net.