<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now with ‘zoom’ layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/now-with-zoom-layout/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/now-with-zoom-layout</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:13:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Boulton</title>
		<link>http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/now-with-zoom-layout/comment-page-1#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Boulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.markboultondesignhosting.com/2005/07/now-with-zoom-layout/#comment-696</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Jough - it&#8217;s changed now, sorry for the inconvenience.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Your comment about the light grey and lighter grey is a really valid point and one which I&#8217;m struggling with in terms of the aesthetics of that part of the design. I *know* it should be darker and more obvious to the people who need it, but at the moment I can&#8217;t quite think of a solution with the same visual subtlety. It&#8217;s an ongoing arguement with myself that one&#8230; :(
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jough — it’s changed now, sorry for the inconvenience.
</p>
<p>
Your comment about the light grey and lighter grey is a really valid point and one which I’m struggling with in terms of the aesthetics of that part of the design. I *know* it should be darker and more obvious to the people who need it, but at the moment I can’t quite think of a solution with the same visual subtlety. It’s an ongoing arguement with myself that one… :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
