Journal
Some thoughts about signs
- Posted on: May 26, 2005
- In: Design, Information Architecture
- Comments closed
For a few years now I’ve had a bit of an interest in signage. Recently I was the only person to get a bit excited about a road transport exhibition in the Design Museum in London. Why? Well, signs are really interesting when you start thinking about them. So, here’s some thoughts about signs and how we, as designers, can look at them differently and incorporate some the ideas behind signage into what we do.
Signage does a number of things - it helps us get to where we want to go, it informs us, warns us and the list goes on. Let's deal with the first one... (or if you're not bothered, skip straight to the confab)
From A to B
Getting to where we want to be. It's a big deal, and signage helps us do that. The professional service dedicated to just this is called Wayfinding, and it does just that, helps us find our way. Wayfinding signage is found in almost every city, building and civilised environment on the globe, from official road signs to hand painted 'toilet' signs in local cafe's.
Having been involved in a couple of wayfinding projects I found the research and development fascinating. It usually involved developing a signage system, mocking it up in black and white prints and building wooden stands, then positioning them in a space and watching how people follow them. As they were temporary we could audit the people flow and make the required changes so that people could find what they want.
Designing a signage system is a little like trying to guess what people want to do in a space. For public buildings, like libraries and museums, they have to inform in addition to pointing people in the right direction. Museums are particularly interesting and, you've guessed where I'm heading with this, the similarities between museum signage and web site architecture are plenty.
Where's the f**king toilet
When somebody enteres a building, especially if they've had a long journey or they had too much orange juice in the morning, they will want to know one thing - 'where is the toilet', they will be single minded in that task as well. They will look for one of two things, a sign with the word, or if it's in another language an icon of a man or a woman. That's it. They shouldn't have to learn a new signage system, or try and work out a designer's 'creative' impression of what a toilet sign should be.
My point is this. Universal signage systems have been developed to overcome language so that manufacturers don't have to produce several products for different markets. This system works well until somebody does it differently and your daughter pees her pants because you couldn't find the toilets because they client wanted to be 'different'!
The same goes for web sites.
Provide clear signage
A user will come to a web site with a specific task in mind. Not going to the toilet, but more like they want to complain about something or they need to buy their daughter some new pants.
I may be preaching to the converted but putting the user first, understanding their goals and designing to them is the best way to deliver on the sites goals.
I know I'm opening up a big can of worms here with possible discussion about iconography, semiotics, usability, Information architecture, UCD etc. But understanding how signage works can go a long way to understanding how people navigate on a web site.
I've been doing a little reading on the subject and it's a bit like opening Pandora's Box. There is a lot out there, specifically on semiotics, but dipping into linguistics and psychology. It's quite difficult to filter some of the information and make it useful for you in a practical sense and you can't read everything right?
So, here's what I've found out so far...
Let's start with Semiotics
Semiotics is the study of signs and symbols and their use or interpretation. There are three main areas:
- The signs themselves
- The way they are organised into systems
- The context in which they appear
Extracting meaning from the signs is then possible once we understand the structure of the signs. They can be categorised like this:
- Icon
- This resembles the sign. A photograph, a diagram, even a sound like 'bang'.
- Index
- This represents a link between the sign and it's meaning. Smoke and fire for example, traffic light colours.
- Symbol
- These signs have no logical meaning between the sign. An example of this would be where a symbol has become linked with an organisation or product, the red cross for example. Symbols are commonly used for logotypes.
- When designing icons for web sites or applications draw on real world signage standards if you can. If you can't, try drawing on metaphor. Arbitrary shapes for icons will not work.
- When thinking about labels for your navigation, think clearly. Simple words for content will go a long way in shortening the gap between sign and task completion.
- Use colour carefully. Point users in the right direction with high contrast signs, or buttons. Just as you may speed down the road at 70 mile an hour and read a sign in less than 2 seconds, a user speeds through a website and may not give you more than two seconds. Be conspicious with your signs.
- Be consistent with your signage. Be it words or icons, be consistent in design and tone of voice. Let your users know what to expect.
- Host the image on your server and link it in here.
- Simple HTML is fine.
- Keep it below 400px wide please or you'll bust me layout.
How is this useful in designing for the web? Well, extremely and not just web design either but designing for any medium.
A person has to establish meaning from a sign or symbol. They then use this meaning to do many things, one of which could be to accomplish a task. The closer the design of the sign is to the task, the quicker meaning is understood and the task is completed.

There is of course the Usability / Aesthetic effect to take into account too. With this in mind applying it to web site design is actually quite straight forward.
A few things to consider
There's just a few things I've picked up over the past few years. Once I get some more stuff worked out, I'll let you know. In the meantime I thought it may be fun to have a bit of a signage confab.
How about a signage confab?
Every designer likes icons or signs right? What's your favourite? This could be a photograph of one, one you've designed, sky's the limit. Usual confab stuff applies:
Oh, and here's mine...

Most recent entries
- Design isn’t about tools
- Where’s the D in D&AD?
- Coolspotters: Where people and products meet
- Alys Rose Boulton
- abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
- From Poly to Pole
- Ten Crimes Against Web Typography (and how to avoid them)
- Start Your Own Business
- Coolspotters and Garcia Media
- Sir Edmund Hillary: 1919 - 2008
Categories
Search
Journal feeds
Books
Stuff I like
Powered by Expression Engine



I'm a graphic designer from near Cardiff in the UK. I've been a designer for over ten years now and primarily work on the web. I'm still partial to a bit of print every now and then though. I used to work for
Comments
Yay. More IA articles. Now I have another article to send to clients who stands by their internal buzzwords etc instead of the needs of their users. Thanks Mark.
On a sidenote, thanks for not selling out to google ads like alot of people do these days. Your credability only get’s stronger by this.
Johan Sjostrand
Thu 26th May 2005
at 4:43 pm
Just noticed the ads… Well.. Thanks anyway.
Johan Sjostrand
Thu 26th May 2005
at 4:44 pm
Thanks Johan, glad you liked it. Any signs to add? btw. the ads are there simply to go some way to pay for my hosting - every little helps right?
Mark Boulton
Thu 26th May 2005
at 4:52 pm
I love the first aid sign. Like the stop sign, it’s incredible valuable to society. Really any symbol that stretches across different cultures amazes me.
About google ads,
I think it’s incredible devious to begin with. Google’s motto “Do no evil” don’t seem to apply here. I mean, you get ads that corrospond pretty much spot on to your interests since it’s picking up on keywords. It’s so hard to resist sometimes.
But most of all, I don’t like how it’s decreases credability online.
A donation option would serv the same purpose and you would not push ads for companies you don’t even know exists.. Allright, enough lefty talk from me.
Johan Sjostrand
Thu 26th May 2005
at 5:12 pm
I may be taking your “sign” analogy one step too far, but since I have a degree in architecture, I feel that I need to chime in on your “where’s the toilet?” example.
For an architect, a sign is an implicit recognition of failure of teh design to communicate properly. (not in all cases, but hey, i’m generalizing) If you go into a restaurant and you are looking for the toilet, you typically head towards the bar or the back of the restaurant, or the design is arranged in such as way that you see the toilets on the way in, before you need them.
A long digression, but I think this is also applicable to the web. Conventions in web design pre-empt user confusion. Things like: a clickable logo in the top-left that serves as a “home” button, left-hand nav, top-nav, search at the top-right, etc. all anticipate user behavior and mitigate the need for “pointers” (signs) to retrain them to use your revolutionary new flash-based navigation.
Not that I don’t like new ideas, but… you get my point, dontcha?
Josh
Thu 26th May 2005
at 6:47 pm
Josh - You’ve got a good point and whilst this works for simple buildings, such as restaurants with a back and front and a device with which you can orient youself (in your example a bar), I don’t whether you can apply this to complex buildings such as airport terminals.
Like you say, the same can be said of websites. Simple websites could simply rely on conventions. More complex website’s, with multiple goals for users, need clear signage.
But I know what you mean. My dad’s an architect and he hates signs. In fact I think most architects do, which is why most wayfinding consultants work independently from the architects - the two professions don’t mix well.
Mark Boulton
Thu 26th May 2005
at 7:01 pm
How does getting paid for all your time, energy, and expenses mean you’re selling out? Mark clearly put a lot of effort into a post, even coming up with a nice illustration for his point. How does it reduce his credibility to have an ad that some people will find useful and you didn’t even notice?
Brian
Thu 26th May 2005
at 7:02 pm
Now on topic…
This spring I’ve seen a ton of businesses advertising along the road using people as signs/sign holders. I think this is more about context than the actual signage, you certainly take notice. Once you’ve got the person’s attention, then the sign needs to be clear and to the point (especially on the roadside.) Whether it’s a person with a sandwich board (as in my photo from NYC) or in a cow costume, I’ve noticed how much I’ve been noticing them so I guess it’s working.
Brian
Thu 26th May 2005
at 7:13 pm
Where did you get that picture of the Korean stop sign? I’ve lived in Korea for ten years, driven here and there around the country, and I can’t remember the last time I saw a stop sign…
Charles
Fri 27th May 2005
at 12:34 am
As a Brit, American road signs have always held some fascination for me, especially the more temporary signs. I saw this sign in Austin, Tx:
Be prepared to stop
There’s something slightly charming and naive about the wording. In the UK, we’d probably just say ‘Caution’ or ‘Roadworks ahead’, which leave it up to the driver to decide on his or her course of action as opposed to the direct instruction provided stateside.
Richard Rutter
Fri 27th May 2005
at 7:41 am
As a Brit, American road signs have always held some fascination for me, especially the more temporary signs. I saw this sign in Austin, Tx:
There?s something slightly charming and naive about the wording. In the UK, we?d probably just say ?Caution? or ?Roadworks ahead?, which leave it up to the driver to decide on his or her course of action as opposed to the direct instruction provided stateside.
[Sorry about the double post. It’s early]
Richard Rutter
Fri 27th May 2005
at 7:48 am
Josh- While I understand your argument and yes, buildings should be designed so that it is obvious where things are, you still need signs. Assuming a restaurant has the perfect layout, without signs I will only see a couple doors. I need to know which door takes me to the men’s room and which is the women’s toilet. Using Mark’s analogy, if my daughter has an emergency and I rush in, I don’t have time to ask someone or start exploring which door she needs to go through. While the exploring should be avoided at all times, for obvious reasons, in this instance the need for concise, easily recognizable signs are certainly important. No, there is no need for signs posted all over the building directing people to that area, but we still need signs on the doors. What I got out of Mark’s post was how important the effectiveness of what the signs communicate is and how that relates to how we label links etc. in web sites. No one wants a site with every link comprised of just non-breaking-spaces.
As a side note, your analogy could be quite effective in helping someone see the importance of the layout of a site. If the location of things on the page are readily obvious, and clearly labeled, users will find them much more easily and quickly.
Waylan
Fri 27th May 2005
at 2:08 pm
Hmm, I just re-read Josh’s comment and see he was really saying the same thing I did in his last paragraph. Sorry if I came across a little to aggressive there.
Oh, and Mark, I like the option to enable or disable the live preview, but when it’s enabled it takes forever for the characters to appear here while typing. I’ll type a entire sentence and only the first word is displayed in the comment box. I then have to wait for the rest to appear one character at a time at less than half the speed of my rather slow typing. I tried disabling the live preview, but it made no difference. Sure, the preview was no longer displayed, but the delays continued in the comment box. With this comment I have not enabled the Live Preview and things seem to work fine. Just thought you’d like to know.
Waylan
Fri 27th May 2005
at 2:20 pm
Thanks Waylan, Yeah I think there’s some problems with the live preview and the way certain browsers cope with the rendering. On Safari for example, as I am typing this, the preview is working fine - no lag, but I have experienced lag on some browsers in the past.
Mark Boulton
Sat 28th May 2005
at 4:45 pm
@Richard - I’m not from America (but Canada) and we have some of the same signs, and like the stop sign, it’s more about the shape and the colour in that situation.
The yellow is the caution sign and sometimes the text changes (but for us, the constuctions signs are an orange with the lil digger)
but like it was already said before, it’s more abotu the shape and colour of the sign (or the graphic(s) on the sign)
Richard Thomas
Tue 31st May 2005
at 1:25 pm
My favorite road sign has to be the UK roundabout sign.
I think it’s a fantastic example of good design through subtraction rather than addition.
If I wanted to indicate the direction of travel around the roundabout I probably would have done something obvious like add directional arrows.
Instead the designer has simply removed a section of the roundabout therefore implying the direction of travel without having to add visual clutter.
Genius.
Andy Budd
Sat 4th Jun 2005
at 11:13 am
Andy Budd: Yep, I like also the signage of the direction so I won’t forget to ride it clokwise when driving in UK ;) ...
Jan Brasna
Sun 5th Jun 2005
at 12:04 am